I heard a story yesterday about an unbelievable stunt pulled by a precocious tweener boy. Get this: he went off to do his own thing at a big public event, crowded with family and strangers. Didn’t tell anyone where he was going, or apparently think for a moment about how worried his parents would be. Which they were, when they realized he was missing — “great anxiety” was how his mother described the search experience. When they finally found him and scolded him, saying, “Why have you treated us like this?!” Did he apologize? Was he chagrined? No – instead he basically said, “Why didn’t you know I’d be here, Mom?”
This story immediately brought to my mind two inter-related response threads in comments to Ruth Padawer’s story in the New York Times Sunday Magazine, one of which is “the problem is these overly permissive parents,” and the other of which is “like it or not, cultures have social norms for a reason and it is a parent’s duty to uphold them” (which I may write about tomorrow).
Here is a taste of comments that express the former thread, all from the online posting of the article:
To accept the premise that the individual – whoever grabs their fifteen minutes of fame – is to define our society as a whole, and we are to continually submit our moral and behavioral standards over to the norm of that individual, is a construct that will destabilize any society to its own destruction. –Reese, Naples, FL
Experimentation is normal for that age, but in these early years it’s the parents responsibility to guide the child according to societal norms and values. If your preschooler has determined to never share toys as part of their “identity”, is that something you would encourage? —RCB Cleveland, OH
This has convinced me never to have children. I could not possibly handle this abnormal behavior. Perhaps that is why the birth rate for litetate people is so low. Reading this article makes me feel so sad or the children and the bullying they will have to endure. –Don Noonan, Bethesda
Is parenting so hard for some of you that you’re willing to let your kid indulge in every fantasy, rather than do your duty, and give your child boundaries? –Rick W. Dallas
“Gender fluid” children? How about useless, gutless excuses for “parents”? How much more screwed up can our country get before it collapses in to big, stinking, unworkable garbage pile. Unlimited “freedom” without any discipline, limits or self-control, whether it is Wall Street bankers or so-called “parents”, always leads to depravity and destruction. God help these “boys”! –Michael, Colorado
So what kind of kid feels that his need to “do his own thing” trumps society’s rules, and what kind of parents let him get away with it? Too bad Jesus and his folks aren’t here to ask — he’s the kid described in the story I heard yesterday.
In our Sunday School class, we’re studying the Gospels in parallel – comparing the ways Matthew, Mark, and Luke tell the story of Jesus’ life and ministry. The story I began this post with, found only in Luke (2:41-52) is the only story about Jesus’ childhood in the New Testament between the age of 2 and the beginning of his ministry. How interesting that it is a story about bucking the system, about doing what he felt called to do rather than doing what he was expected to! (“Did you not know that I must be in my Father’s house?”)
Perhaps more than anything, it’s a story about his parents, trying to figure out how to respond to a kid who’s obviously special, but who seems really out of line in the moment. Pause for a moment to really imagine how they felt — it took them three days to find him. Absorb that panic and worry, the self-recrimination that you thought he was off with aunt Elizabeth and didn’t make sure he was OK earlier, etc. And then when you finally find him, he says, “What? Didn’t you know I’d need to be here?” Before you start thinking how much easier it would be for them, since they already knew he was the Son of God and all, the very next sentence says, “But they did not understand what he said to them.”
And then there’s an interesting little tidbit – they go on back home to Nazareth and he “was obedient to them.” It’s like Luke was letting us know that it’s not that Jesus was a bad kid. He was generally obedient and all the things a good Jewish boy should be. And presumably that’s what his parents thought as well – “He’s a good kid who generally toes the line, does what he’s told, and respects our authority. I guess this particular issue was something somehow different, and really important. I’m not sure what it means, but we need to pay attention to it.” Yep, that resonates with me.
I find it laughable that some readers of Padawer’s piece immediately assume that we’re a bunch of wishy-washy lefty liberals who let our kids walk all over us. (I find it laughable to assume that lefty liberals are wishy-washy for that matter; ever heard of Anne Braden? But that’s another post.) I expect that most people who know me would not characterize my parenting that way!
If anything, my partner and I emphasize self-control. Your experience as our kid would include: If you interrupt while we’re talking, you’re ignored. We can’t understand whiny voices, so better try again with a big-kid voice. If I have to intervene in a sibling argument, you’re both standing against the wall. You will say please and thank you. You will use Mr. and Ms. when you speak to adults. You will ask for things politely. (I have been known to respond to “I want!” with my favorite Jessica Lang line from Sweet Dreams: “People in hell want ice water, but that don’t mean they get it.”)
When our son was little, he was so anxious about talking to people that he would not say thank you for gifts. So he had to make thank-you notes instead. (I may not have always managed to get them in the mail, but we were consistent about requiring them!) Of course, politeness can be fun: Around the holidays, our family plays the Present Game, where each person takes a turn finding an object around the house, wrapping it up, and presenting it to another. The recipient has to say thank you for the gift with a concrete reason that it is great. We try to stump each other with ridiculous items, and have great fun coming up with reasons like, “Thank you so much for this broken pencil. I love using my new pencil sharpener so I’ll really enjoy this!”
Are we perfect? Of course not. Do our kids wear us down sometimes? Sure. And they’re both drama royals who have occasional melt-downs, too. But the notion that we let our kids do whatever they want is ludicrous. It seems to be based on an intense discomfort with the idea that this particular self-expression could be fundamental, long-lasting and overpowering rather than a whim, and/or the belief that letting children express individuality is the same as spoiling them.
I’m not comparing my kids to Jesus. They have a hard enough time most days drinking their water without spilling it; I’m not looking for them to turn it into wine any time soon. But I find it really interesting that Luke sets up this choice for parents and leaves us to wonder: what do we gain if we allow our child’s self-expression or individuality to flourish, and what do we as a society lose if we don’t?
(Luke is also the Gospel that gives us the birth story of John the Baptist, which contains a story of parents choosing individual expression for their son — his name — over the cultural expectation, leaving people to wonder, “What, then, is this child going to be?”)
The world changes in response to individuals who refuse to compromise their core identity and beliefs. Ghandi refiused to accept the definlition of his self imposed by the culture in South Africa and by the British in India. The British Empire gave in to his nonconformist leadership for independence. it took South Africa longer, but another nonconformist, Nelson Mandela, articiulated the dream and led the change. I grew up in the segregated south, and Martin Luther King knew full well what that ciulture expected of him. God cherishes diversity. Biological diversity flourishes throughout nature. If a child realizes within that God has provided a special gift and identity, I will always respect that child’s right to conform to God and defend the child’ from irrational pressures to conform to artficial standards. I appreciate a God of diversity.
Amen.
There are also a lot of “if I had a kid like that, I would beat it out of them” comments on the web, for instance, on the My Princess Boy book reviews. I find the lack of empathy almost as alarming as the lack of imagination on the part of so many. If our children play in clothes marketed to girls, we must be terrible parents, perverse in some way. Couldn’t be the system that’s flawed. Hmph.
i’m always amazed when people use the bible as an excuse to (try to) beat things out of their kids! i think your kids are pretty lucky to have you for a parent. thanks for sharing! ❤
thank you for sharing this – my response to “boys shouldn’t wear dresses” is WWJW = what would Jesus wear? whether or not you believe Jesus is a messiah, his teachings have so much to offer the world: having compassion, helping others, not judging by circumstance or stereotype, forgiveness and love. Biblical scholars fill books with it but why don’t we see more of the people who espouse the Bible living these values? Ok – so you don’t understand why my kid is different, he is what God made him and maybe that is beyond your understanding. Does that give you the right to deride or denigrate him? What would Jesus think of that?
just to clarify – WWJW – Jesus wore robes much more comparable to a dress than anything viewed as acceptable for men in Western Culture. let’s remember, fashion is dictated by culture and expectation more often than by function.
When I started reading this post, I immediately saw where you were headed. Well done.
You must know your Bible! 😉
Hey there!
I really likes this post (partially because I just wrote a post last night about parents of trans kids and it made me smile that I found this post this morning).
Honestly, I have never seen the point in “color coding our kids” as my girlfriend says and it seems so strange to me that we are expected and to an extent almost forced into these societal norms as if the whole world would end if we didn’t uphold them.
We have crossed social boundaries so many times over history. Women’s rights, freeing black slaves, separating church and state, all of those things were “against the social norms” of the time and the world did not end.
Personally, I think you sound like amazing parents and that your kids and going to turn out just fine.
Stay excellent,
Tony
Pingback: Stop worrying! There is happiness beyond the gender binary | JP Murphy
I have a 3 month old and am too tired to write anything educated and witty so here we go. Thrilled I stumbled upon your fabulous blog and disgusted by those assholes whose comments from the nytimes article you shared above. Keep fighting the good fight. We need more people like you to advocate for our children. I admire your commitment. You rock.